doi: JAIRAM 0021-8669 Link Google Scholar and Shi A., “ Numerical Study of Propeller Slipstream Based on Unstructured Overset Grids,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 49, No. 2, 2012, pp. 384–389. and Wang H., “ Numerical Simulation of Propeller Slipstream Effect on a Propeller-Driven Unmanned Aerial Vehicle,” Procedia Engineering, Vol. 31, Feb. 2012, pp. 150–155.
and Schroder A., “ Advanced Experimental and Numerical Validation and Analysis of Propeller Slipstream Flows,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 47, No. 1, 2010, pp. 284–291.
doi: JFEGA4 0098-2202 Crossref Google Scholar and Schroder A., “ Flowfield Investigation at Propeller Thrust Reverse,” Journal of Fluids Engineering, Vol. 132, No. 6, June 2010, Paper 061101. and Schroder A., “ Investigation of the Propeller Slipstream with Particle Image Velocimetry,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 46, No. 2, 2009, pp. 442–449. and Bataille B., “ Aerodynamic Design of Micro Air Vehicles for Vertical Flight,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 45, No. 5, 2008, pp. 1715–1724. of Technology, Wright–Patterson AFB, OH, 2006. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Air Force Inst. J., “ Experimental Analysis of Propeller Interactions with a Flexible Wing Micro-Air-Vehicle,” M.S. H., “ Aerodynamic Modeling of the Wing–Propeller Interaction for a Tail-Sitter Unmanned Air Vehicle,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 45, No. 1, 2008, pp. 198–210. M., “ Different Wing Flowfields Interaction on the Wing–Propeller Coupling,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 34, No. 6, 1997, pp. 740–747. P., “ Aerodynamic Interaction Between Propeller and Wings,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 26, No. 9, 1989, pp. 829–836. and Kisielowski E., “ Prediction of Span Loading of Straight-Wing/Propeller Combinations Up to Stall,” NASA CR-2602, 1975. and Kisielowski E., “ Investigation of Propeller Slipstream Effects on Wing Performance,” U.S. E., “ A Theory for VTOL Propeller Operation in a Static Condition,” U.S.
As well, the proposed model matches the simplicity of conventional models and is therefore suitable for real-time applications.
The proposed model is shown to be in good agreement with the experimental data for several different propellers and configurations, up to ∼ 6 propeller diameters downstream of the propeller plane, with an rms error of 0 – 2 m / s in velocity. This paper presents a propeller slipstream model that considers both acceleration and diffusion within the slipstream using simple analytical and semi-empirical equations. However, because these conventional theories consider only acceleration of air within the slipstream and not diffusion, their applicability in regions far downstream of the propeller where diffusion is dominant, is questionable. Propeller slipstream models based on conventional theories, such as the momentum theory, have been used extensively in the literature to predict the induced air velocity within the slipstream. This includes modeling the effect of the propeller slipstream, also called prop wash, which is the main source of airflow that helps maintain lift and control during near-zero forward-speed flight like that encountered during vertical/short takeoff and landing, as well as during high-angle-of-attack flight/aerobatic maneuvering like hovering. Recent interest in high-angle-of-attack flight, aerobatic maneuvering, vertical/short takeoff and landing, etc., of small unmanned aerial vehicles necessitates more detailed modeling of the complex aerodynamics associated with these flight regimes.